The design initially had 16 centre points, four groups of four, but due to copy-and-pasting there are only four unique centre points in the design. What happened? It turns out that operators running the design had copied and pasted the first result of a block of four centre points to the others. The centre points have all been run one after the other, but what stands out is that centre points that are together have exactly the same value. This analysis was from a custom design that was imported into Minitab using Stat > DOE > Factorial > Define Custom Factorial Design. Here is a snippet of the design worksheet (it is in coded values and the names are masked).Ĭolumn C5 to Column C10 are the factors, and the data are displayed in the run order of the worksheet. Interesting.there has to be a story behind this data! On the Residuals versus fitted values chart, those eight green dots look like two, again indicating that you have duplicated values.
![residual plot minitab residual plot minitab](https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat462/sites/onlinecourses.science.psu.edu.stat462/files/resources/MT_norm_prob_plot/index.png)
Notice that this occurs in two other places on the chart. Those green points show a row of four at the same value. Now look at the Residuals versus the Order of the Data graph in the lower left. Vertical lines of dots on the normal probability plot indicates data with the same value. This reveals them on the Residuals Versus the Fitted Values and Residuals Versus the Order of the Data charts as well.įirst points to notice are not just that the brushed points are a long way from the rest of the data they are in vertical lines. Here they are below, with points of interest highlighted in green by brushing. This is especially true when looking at the normal probability plot of the residuals. Thankfully, Minitab provides tools to verify these assumptions: The Four in One residual plots (Stat > DOE > Factorial > Analyze Factorial Design > Graphs).Īs mentioned in my previous post, probability plots can reveal a lot of interesting things about the data. The errors have constant variance across all factor levels.The errors do not deviate substantially from a normal distribution.The errors are independent (and thus random).Therefore, it is strongly recommended to always verify the following assumptions about the errors in your data, before accepting the results of a DOE :
![residual plot minitab residual plot minitab](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/3-s2.0-B9780080994178000092-f09-45-9780080994178.jpg)
If these assumptions are satisfied, then ordinary least squares regression will produce unbiased coefficient estimates with the minimum variance. Examining residual plots helps you determine if the ordinary least squares assumptions are being met. Residuals are used in regression and ANOVA analyses to indicate how well your model fits the data. It was the residual plots that showed the unusual effects. Whilst we were able to help illustrate its use and answer the customer query, something else about the analysis caught our eye. We recently had a technical support request about using the Response Optimizer after analysing a factorial design in Minitab.